Links to other sites
Piccies
Ray tracing
Music
Amiga
Back to home

Back to Stuff

Left Wing Propensity For Violence Will Get Them Nowhere

Today is the day after the inauguration of President Bush for his second term. The news today was about the violence yesterday. There were photos of protesters fighting police and a photo of someone throwing a snowball at the vice presidents limo.

The text in one article mention the protesters trying to "shout down" Mr. Bush during the proceedings.

Let's see, that's Disturbing the Peace and Assault Against A Police Officer, at least.

And it's violence, direct physical violence. You can't argue that simple fact.

Now, as in the 1960s, violence from so-called "anti-war" people is hypocritical. Their actions conflict with their words.

Now consider the two inaugurations of President Clinton, a democrat, a member of the Left Wing. There was no violence from the Right Wing: they knew they had lost the election, fair and square, and for them that ended the matter. There were no protests. The affair was conducted in a civilized manner, as it should be. There was no violence from the Right Wing.

So, what does this all mean?

Right Wingers are more logical than left wingers, Right Wingers follow the rules. Right Wingers are not violent. Left Wingers cannot accept the fact that Bush won the popular vote. Left Wingers are violent. Left Wingers would rather raise a fist against fellow Americans than against hostile foreigners.

Who do you want running things? Left or Right? The actions of the Left Wing make the choice easier and easier to make.